I've already disproven the 12-0 by Aery and I admit I am not up in series right now with Kazz. But why does that matter? The game is dead. I was up in series when it mattered, which was ogp.
They are not, if you mean BTOP 1v1ers. Most top btop 1v1ers will get trashed in cove, moon, gw, etc. I don't really comprehend how they would be the best in the game if they are only good in 1 map. The best is being good at all maps, 1v1er may be able to do that, but are they also the best at other maps? Don't think so. You can only really say best at the game when you find an individual that is #1 at more than 1 map. I know few like this.
Is this abort ? Edit- No matter how good you are at any map if you can’t 1v1 you aren’t good at the game it’s that simple. I never said anything about blacktop dungeon or any other map I specifically said 1v1ers & you guys automatically assumed it was blacktop players because THE known ones have already proven themselves capable in other maps lmao. “Most top btop players would get trashed in another map . Been proven wrong plenty of times. The same thing with mooners & gwers coming to Btop but it’s only a certain few that’s can keep up. You yourself should know that. Also I always found the being the best at gw sht idiotic because no matter how good you are it all depends on the teams & rules.
Ok, I agree with the title of this forum then, because no SHT 1v1ers are the best at the game, but to elaborate on the gw sht, I personally can carry 1v4s and I think that its one of those traits you need to be best. I like that you mentioned mooners & gwers coming to btop, because ralphjos demonstrated that transition perfectly.
I was and forever will be the best player to touch this game, haven't seen anyone post a record of 98.8% winrate yet but myself.